Lewin’s Styles of Leadership

 

When a skilled and influential leader pilot any organizational structure, country, or political party, it achieves. Leaders can motivate their followers, but that isn't the only thing they can do. A good leaders have the ability to structure the organization in whatever way he desires.

He represents the organization's culture, and most crucially, it has been noted that effective leaders have the ability to boost the organization's productivity. Various academics classify leadership styles in various ways. Autocratic leadership, Democratic leadership, and Delegative (Laissez-Faire) leadership are the three types of leadership identified by Lewin (1939).

Adolf Hitler -  Authoritarian leadership style

The start of the 20th century depicted the upsurge of various authoritarian states and the upsurge to power of history's most horrific leaders. Most of these leaders were authoritarian. There are several leaders who come to mind when we talk about authoritarian leadership. But even among them, the first thing that comes to mind is Adolf Hitler. His arrival also took place during this period.

Let's first look at what an authoritarian leadership style. Authoritarian leadership is a management style in which an individual has total decision-making power and absolute control over his subordinates.

An authoritarian leader makes decisions on policies, procedures and group objectives with little or no input from his or her team members or followers. There are the chief characteristics of authoritarian leadership leaders make decisions with little or no participation or creative input from their followers or team members, leaders independently preside over policies and processes and group members are always directly supervised by the leader.

Authoritarian leadership denotes the leadership style that involves the leader having complete control and decision-making power over the citizens. Authoritarian leaders like and Hitler intimidated the citizens and other nations throughout the globe. In Germany, Hitler established himself as great, God-like leader while compelling his nation to go through cruel programs of reform. Adolf Hitler's methods of maintaining total control was by the utilization of force and terror. To begin with, he gave the German police, sometimes known as the Gestapo, the authority to arrest and imprison anyone for whatever reason they saw fit. In addition, Hitler used the SS (Shooting Squad) to terrorize the population. The SS served as Hitler's personal assassins.

The similarity between the majority of authoritarian leaders is that they often maintain the political power through the use of force and propaganda. They usually manufacture the external threats so as to attain regulation over the state and force the people to view them as their only salvation. For instance, Hitler ended up blaming the Jews for all the problems experienced in Germany and defended his cruel acts during the Holocaust through the use of force and propaganda that defamed the Jews. As an authoritarian leader, Hitler is known for his cruelty and use of force during his reign.

Hitler's cruel dictatorship made him unpopular with the people. His work zone is a perfect example of the Authoritarian leadership style.

 Barack Obama - Democratic leadership style

Early in the twentieth century, there was a greater interest in leadership. People began to consider what makes a great leader and whether or not distinct leadership methods exist. One of the notions that surfaced around this time was democratic leadership.

Barack Obama Barack Obama has impacted America in many ways since he was elected the 44th president on November 4th, 2008. The first African American president of the United States has taken the world by storm and done many great things for this country. Barack Obama has accomplished many things in his personal life, and also as the president of the United States. Obama has affected the world financially, economically, and rebuilt our image as a nation.

Democratic leadership, which is also commonly known as participative leadership, is about letting multiple people participate in the decision-making process. Democratic leadership is often confused with the idea of the political philosophy of democracy. While the similarities are obviously there, the style also has its own unique quirks and variations. To understand democratic leadership, one must understand the balancing act of allowing everyone to participate in decision-making and ensuring the organization achieves its objectives.

Every day during Obama's presidency, he read ten letters from the public. It was his technique of making sure he didn't stray from his main purpose of serving the American people.

This is a gentle reminder that it doesn't take much to connect with the people you serve, at a time when government leaders can frequently appear detached from the people they represent. This is key features of a good democratic leader. 

But one thing is clear Obama kept his people engaged and calm under pressure every time he spoke during his two years, or when you hear anyone reminisce on their experience under his guidance. Aspiring leaders should take a page from the previous president's book.

Considering Obama's leadership qualities, it is in line with democratic leadership style. Therefore, we can call Barack Obama a leader who valued democracy.

Mahatma Gandhi - Laissez-faire leadership style

The French word laissez-faire literally means "let them do," which can be translated to "leave things be" in English. Leaders that use this leadership style delegate responsibilities to team members and allow them to work independently with little or no supervision.

Mahatma Gandhi was a laissez-faire leader, which means he led by example and empowered his followers to improve their lives. To be a laissez-faire leader, a leader can do a variety of things. Motivating your followers, making them want to accomplish things on their own terms, and feeling confident are all aspects of the laissez-faire style.

 Gandhi was a laissez-faire leader because he had to unite people many times throughout his life to do the things, he engaged in. Doing so exhibits two of the characteristics that characterize a laissez-faire leader. Empowering people to stand up for what they believe involves making them feel confident and bold about what they will do or about themselves, which is exactly what Mahatma Gandhi did to bring people together. Gandhi was self-assured at all times. The spiritual leader needed enough confidence and trust in himself to be able to use satyagraha (a nonviolent and peaceful manner of addressing the law), since if he wasn't confident and can't trust himself, he would never have been capable of achieving what he did. True, Gandhi was not a leader on paper in many areas, but he was always striving to lead and unite people in whatever he did, which led to him developing a leadership style known as laissez-faire leadership, which is a style that fit him perfectly.

Because of this, Mahatma Gandhi can be considered a good laissez faire leader.